Posted at 12:32 PM in 1. Trillium New Houses | Permalink | Comments (0)
Posted at 10:02 AM in 1. Trillium New Houses | Permalink | Comments (0)
Technorati Tags: Affordable, Beautiful homes, Fairfield County, Green architecture, Green design, Green home, Sustainable materials
Posted at 01:49 PM in 1. Trillium New Houses | Permalink | Comments (0)
Technorati Tags: Affordable, Beautiful homes, Fairfield County, Green architecture, Green design, Green home, Sustainable materials
Posted at 01:24 PM in 1. Trillium New Houses | Permalink | Comments (0)
Technorati Tags: Affordable, Beautiful homes, Fairfield County, Green architecture, Green design, Green home, Sustainable materials
Posted at 12:25 PM in 1. Trillium New Houses | Permalink | Comments (0)
Technorati Tags: Affordable, Beautiful homes, Fairfield County, Green architecture, Green design, Green home, Sustainable materials
Posted at 11:41 AM in LEED Home in Rowayton, CT | Permalink | Comments (0)
Technorati Tags: Affordable, Beautiful homes, Fairfield County, Green architecture, Green design, Green home, LEED home
Friday July 9, 2010! 4:30 pm. We hope to see you there!
THIS EVENT HAS BEEN POSTPONED TO MID AUGUST!! DATE T.B.D.
Posted at 01:53 PM | Permalink | Comments (0)
Posted at 08:52 AM in LEED Home in Rowayton, CT | Permalink | Comments (0)
Would you rather drive a Yugo or a Mercedes? How about a Prius? With cars it is generally considered obvious- you get what you pay for. There are quality levels associated with cars brands and price tags. What are we talking about when we say 'quality'. Generally quality in a car refers to the power of the engine, the expected longevity of the product, the experience to the interior, the overall driving experience, etc.
Traditionally, however, in America quality has not referred fuel efficiency nor has it referred to the amount of time the car spends in the shop.
Traditionally high-end cars like Mercedes, BMW, Audi,etc do not necessarily get exceptional gas mileage and many of them have the reputation for going to shop a lot more often than- say a Toyota.
{If we start talking about even higher- valued cars (Maserati, Ferrari, Jaguar) - Gas mileage goes down, shop time goes up even more. But that is ok because they are such amazing driving experiences and usually they are not the cars we use on a daily basis - so lets not look at those for the moment.}
But lets get back to the Mercedes, BMW, Audi, Lexus etc. Nice cars. Status symbols. Fantastic! Who wants to drive a Toyota when you could drive better? These are the cars many of us drive everyday and in the last years a shift has begun to take place. Most of these companies have begun creating more energy efficient versions of their cars. In Europe more energy efficient versions of these cars have long been the norm.
Why? Because even people with plenty of money available to drive these cars have become aware of the price of oil on many levels. If you are smart enough to make enough money to buy one of these cars, you are generally smart enough to understand the value of a dollar.
[A friend of mine (a very wealthy, high achieving friend in the financial industry) asked me my opinion of the Land Rover he was about to purchase. I said right off the bat "I love it. It is a beautiful car! I have often dreamed of having one in my own driveway". he smiled. But then I said "BUT- did you know that car gets about 12 miles to the gallon?" He rolled his eyes- there she goes again, on and on about the environment. But really my argument has nothing to do with the environment this time. It is purely financial. This friends drives all over the tri-state area every day. Say he drives 100 miles a day (which he does easily- for work and on the weekends.). That would mean he would go thru just about an entire tank of gas every 2.5 days. It would cost him about $75 to fill up. That means it costs him about $225 a week- well over $11,000 a year!! simply to fill his tank!! Plus it means he has to constantly go to the gas station! What a drag. I go to the gas station once a week, spend $45, and I hate it!]
So all of these awesome car companies are going the route of the Prius...at least in the efforts toward fuel efficiency. And people are asking for it. It is slowly becoming the logical thing to drive a hybrid. It is even respected amongst the wealthy and those who don't believe in global warming. Great! There are strong reasons for fuel efficiency that have little to do with the environment.
QUALITY should refer to design, beauty, solid long lasting product, power, AND efficiency. It should be a great driving experience on every level.
The same is true of houses. You can get a builder box (a Yugo) you can get a developer home (a normal Honda Civic perhaps) or you can get something better.
That's what we design at Trillium Architects, We design anything from the Prius of houses or a Mercedes ML 450 Hybrid and beyond. If you are designing a new house or simply want to renovate or upgrade the house you are in- why waste your money? The same money can be put toward quality, efficiency, beauty and a great LIVING experience... or it can be put toward a lower quality- large quantity box.
But doesn't it cost a lot more money? Not necessarily. When we design we focus on:
1.quality of construction = energy efficiency + low maintenance
2.excellence of spacial experience and use = smaller overall square footage
3.light and air quality= less energy use and higher indoor health and a naturally cleaner environment.
4. health, beauty and textural experience of materials and products = a well loved, longer lasting home.
All of these things if planned well and executed properly may result in no or little up front additional cost and a lot less operational cost over time.
We don't design huge houses. We design extremely high quality houses of more modest size. Yes we understand that traditionally the size of your house was a status symbol. For some that will always be true(think Ferrari). But for many the quality of your house and the amazing energy efficiency of your house is the new status symbol...like a really nice new BMW X6 Hybrid.
Posted at 08:05 AM in Thoughts, Musings and Rants | Permalink | Comments (0)
Here are some updated photos of the Rowayton House. It is getting its siding put on and Carlos and his team are doing a great job!
The siding is James Hardie Hardie Board - a fiber cement composite product. The trim is MiraTEC which "are manufactured with environmentally preferable phenolic resins use recycled content and have no added formaldehyde". We are using these products because they greatly reduce the need for maintenance (including painting and cleaning with harsh chemicals) and last a very long time (both can easily go 20 years without a new paint job and will last indefinitely.)And by using these products we are not using raw natural recourses- like Cedar,etc. Plus these products look great. We are VERY picky regarding aesthetics and these pass the test.
We do not use vinyl products on any of our houses (unless ABSOLUTELY necessary for very small applications where nothing else will hold up to the weather). We do not use vinyl becuase it has such a negative impact on the environment and the people who live inthe vicinity of vinly plants (cancer, mostly in the soth). Please check out the film Blue Vinyl for a better understanding. plus vinyl looks awful and is NOT problem free...
What are all of those battens doing there? You can see vertical wood battens all over the house. These are for letting the siding 'breathe'. Allowing the siding to breathe reduces moisture build up behind the siding and makes the siding and the paint job last even LONGER! (This also works with cedar or any other siding.)
We have clad the house with a structural insulated sheathing (SIS) material from Dow (a 1" thick board that replaces normal sheathing- like plywood or OBS) that does the double job of giving stability to the framing and a continous layer of insulation for a much better thermal envelope (more on that in the Insulation Post which is coming I promise! I have been so busy and that post will be a meaty one!) Anyway the SIS also has the added benifit of providing an air barrier- sort of like Tyvek. We have taped all of the seams at the edges of each board and at each door and window,etc. Reducing the amount of air infiltrating into the house does the same thing that the airspace behind the shingles does- it tremendously reduces the amount of moisture and deterioration within the wall. And that cuts down on mold, mildew, dust mites and spiders,etc. never mind rot! AND it makes the insulation perform much better.
Air moves moisture. Hot (air) moves toward cold, moist moves towards dry (usually via the air). Basic thermodynamics. We want moisute to stay out of walls and away from siding or anything else that likes to be eaten by mold and mildew. We want to control temperature and moisture.
I always say: Its like a swimming pool. You don't want any cracks in your swimming pool. If you have cracks and you want your pool to be full- it will seep out thru the bottom. If you have cracks and you want your pool to be empty you will have water seeping in from underground. You want to control when water goes in and when it goes out. (You can't control it all- think splashing or evaporation.) But you can do you best to control it where you can. Then YOU decide when to add or subtract water.
Your house is the same. Your walls are the same. YOU can control the air and moisture in your home (or you equipment can do so automatically. You can either have a passive or active system monitor your air and moisture.) But you know exactly how, when and where it is coming and going. This also allows for installing air filtration systems. A tight, well sealed, well insulated house is never lacking for fresh air if done correctly. Simple air exchange- fans,etc. easily assure the homeowner of pleanty of fresh air... More on that in the Insulation part also.
OK- have a great day! More soon!
Elizabeth
Posted at 11:45 AM in Tech Talk - House Parts | Permalink | Comments (0)
GUEST BLOGGER!
(But remember ~ Justin is in
Hybridize Your Home!
‘Hybridize Your Home’ is a term that I like to use to describe the
path to alternative energy because it seems like so many think that energy
efficiency is still the realm of granola-eating hippies at the one end, and the
changing of a few light bulbs at the other. Hybridized makes us think of
smart neighbors that drive a Prius and have Scandinavian designed computer
bags. Also, hybridization implies multiple systems functioning
simultaneously, or trading off when it is better for one to work than the
other. Which is perfect for describing how we can improve the value,
livability, and carbon footprint of our homes.
I raise hybridization and alternative energy with you as your
Realtor because it is fundamentally tied to the cost of your home, and the
long-term enjoyment and comfort of that home. (As always, email me at justinchipman@kw.com or give me a call at
303-955-4618 for specific information about your home, or to schedule a free
consultation).
Because it is beyond the scope of an email, let me give you ten
quick ideas to think about alternative energy and the direction that you need
to take to maximize the use of your dollars, and to minimize the cost of living
and the energy that you use.
As a general rule, lower your consumption through efficiency and
smart choices, then look to the sun. Here are some important steps.
1. Look at your energy bill! Most people just see
the shocking number at the bottom, but you need to look at the breakdown
between gas (or oil) and electricity. Chances are that, if you are in
2. After you determine which is greater, consider that you
will get more bang for your buck by first focusing on more efficient gas
systems than on replacing your electrical system. It looks really good to
get that big rack of panels on your rooftop—and I encourage that--but it is
always cheaper and easier to go for the other things first. Let the
savings from a tank-less system pay for those panels in a few years.
3. ‘Go Tank-less’. Tank-less hot water systems have
come a long way. They are expensive if compared to the up front cost of a
conventional hot water unit, but that difference is paid off quickly. It
costs more to keep a conventional hot water heater hot than it does for one
person to actually use a tank-less system. Think about how really stupid
it is for us, as a nation, to be keeping 4.8 billion gallons of water hot all
of the time.
That’s right, about 4.8 billion gallons of water are being kept
hot right now. We could save that energy every second of every day just
by going tank-less.
4. Replace when things break. Most of us have old
hot water heaters and forced air heating systems. If you have a furnace
that needs new guts, or a hot water heater that has rotted from inside out,
then now is the time to go tank-less. Tank-less systems can REPLACE your
furnace AND provide you with hot water. The savings are massive (can be
about 50%). These systems seem expensive up front, but remember the cost
to our society—4.8 billion gallons being kept hot every second of every day.
The cost of the replacement is actually trivial by comparison.
Remember, the energy companies are your enemy in this. 4.8
billion gallons of sitting hot water is nice payday for them, so the nation by
being sensibly alternative costs the private energy companies Trillions.
Oh, that is not a loss unless you watch Fox. Those trillions saved
by you can be used to spend on other things that you might want more.
Things like sending your kids to college. A new car. A nicer
home. You get the idea.
5. Solar Thermal Supplement. (SOLAR DOES WORK IN THE
NORTHEAST! Not as well as it does in
I have lived in homes where all of the domestic hot water was
provided by the sun. Other than showering in the afternoon instead of the
morning, it is really no big deal. In traditional homes, this super hot
water, provided free of charge by the sun, can go a long way to heating the
home, also.
6. Boiler Replacement. If you have a boiler, not a
furnace, then consider a new boiler. New boilers operate at 96%
efficiency. Old boilers commonly do about 55%-60%. You can cut the
heating cost in half. I have paid off boilers in 3 years, so as a simple
investment it is kind of a no-brainer. I know that it isn’t sexy to, say,
forgo buying that new car, but pay for the new energy systems first—the savings
will pay for the car in a few years.
Again, the energy companies are not your friends. They
want for you to pay them to pump natural gas into your home and to generate
electricity by burning coal to boil water to turn a generator so that they can
run electrons through your wires.
7. Boilers will do your domestic hot water. If you
have a boiler you can easily add a zone that will heat all of your domestic hot
water. The boiler has vastly more power than a hot water heater, so it
does so much more efficiently and cheaply. You can also add a couple of
cheap rooftop solar thermal panels, which will supplement this system, also.
8. Now that the gas (oil) hogs are eating less, get to the
electric. Here is a punch list of electric savings:
A. Turn off your lights, silly.
B. Hang dry most of your clothes. You don’t need
lines outside, just get a pile of plastic hangers and hang the clothes on a
rod, on a door, on the shower curtain, even in the closet. It will
humidify your home and your clothes will smell great. The dryer is one of
the two big hogs in your home. It takes seconds and saves you a bundle.
C. Electric piggy number 2 is your refrigerator. If
you have an old one, get rid of it. Get rid of the old on in the garage
or basement, too. We buy massive amounts of food in bulk to save money,
then we spend hundreds keeping it cold or frozen for six months.
As a note to anti-regulation bozos, the refrigerator is the
great example of how regulation can work in our favor. Basically modern
refrigerators use about 40% of the energy than those built in the 70’s.
Our scientists and engineers are smart, just give them the right problem
and they can probably get it done.
D. Hitch all electronic devices to power strips—in one or
two easy locations--and turn the strip on and off as needed. You can also
buy a $5.00 timer so that you only have the power strip turned on during
specific times. Do it manually if you don’t want to do the timer thing.
I have built switches into my house so that I can turn off specific
outlets that are likely to have charging devices or items like stereos that
always seem to have something turned on. This is impractical for many,
but it makes a difference. Think, how many clocks do we need?
There are billions of devices that are turned on, but not being
used. A power strip and an ounce of conscience would save us, as a
nation, billions of watts.
9. Get that bill out again—After you have made some easy
changes--how many watts do you use now? Once you know how many watts you
use each month, then you can predict the size of solar system that you would
need. It is much, much cheaper to simply turn things off than to buy
another 1000 watts in generating power, I can show you this if you don’t
believe me.
10. Net metering! In most places you now have net
metering. When you are generating power that you are not using, your
meter runs backwards. You are giving to the grid and other users can take
advantage of your personal power generation. Easy. No political
battles. No giant federal programs for those of you that are celebrating
‘Confederate Month’, and no more infrastructure. It is really quite
brilliant. The sun is shining and it is hot. You aren’t at home,
but your solar panels are generating power like crazy. You are sitting in
your office, and since your office is using electricity, and your home is
making electricity and giving it back to the grid, you are indirectly
contributing clean energy to the cooling of your office.
Think of the city as a giant tree and each rooftop as a leaf of
that tree. The existing electric grid is like the branches of that tree,
so the system is already in place to distribute the power generated by individuals.
I know that I harp on this point, but the energy companies are
hostile to this system because they no longer monopolize power generation in a
world that is focused on utilizing solar energy. Each end user has the
ability to also be a provider. It is naturally co-operative and about
nearly as red, commie, socialistic as nature itself.
If you want a preachy, personal rant on the stupidity of the
rhetoric of our times, then that is also free of charge. I’ll even buy
the coffee!
11. You’re still on the grid, so you don’t have to pay for
perfect. These few easy steps, done over time by everyone, would cut
total household fossil fuel usage by about 75%. Maybe more. It is
important that everyone know that this is a smart investment in your own home,
and not a moralistic expense. This isn’t Buck Rogers technology, either.
It is off the shelf technology, particularly cost effective when
installed in the place of outdated systems, backed up by the system that we all
currently use and understand. It is simple and insanely inexpensive when
compared to the trillions of dollars that we will spend in order for the energy
companies to provide us with energy that they produce.
If you have read this far, you are truly my people and I thank
you!
Thanks.
Justin
Posted at 11:46 AM in Thoughts, Musings and Rants | Permalink | Comments (0)
Sorry I was away on vacation last week and lost time for blogging to the beach! While there I was thinking about a time when I was younger and had less responsibility and how I used to travel and live 'off the grid'. So when I came back to an email from a guy who wants to build a house out of shipping containers - well- I had a lot to say!
(There is often the urge - especially in the green or creative worlds - to use found objects or alternative products as building materials. In architecture school we all do projects of this sort. It is very mind opening for a designer to really work through the realities and fantasies of building.)
Below is part of that email:
I used to live in the high desert of Colorado (I lived in Crestone CO, in the Sangre de Cristos just north of Taos + Sant Fe) I lived there in a converted railroad box car. While there I built straw bale and adobes and pumice houses and earthshps (passive solar tire houses). So I am very familiar with building in the climate of the desert as well as that of Connecticut.
I have always been interested in container architecture and have done many designs with containers in mind and while I feel it is possible to get a pretty awesome house out them I think that it is only ideal for certain climates- like Los Angeles (where I also used to live).Your average shipping container is not like this. The average container is all steel and only steel. There is no built in insulation and there is no beautiful exterior or interior surface as a given. Unless you live in L.A. you have to add insulation. (For either heating OR cooling). And unless you truly love the look and feel of cold rough steel as a wall surface you have to cover the interior and possibly exterior with something more appealing. (Drywall, wood paneling, cedar,etc). Steel can look really cool- especially slightly rusted- but really you probably don't want to lean on it or touch it a lot in your day to day living. It will always feel very cold.
I could see a steel exterior but then you would have to add insulation to the interior and then a secondary wall inside to cover the insulation and so would lose a 4-6 inches all around the house on the inside. Containers are already small inside.Also you will have to cut openings for windows and doors and carefully craft the doors and windows to fit those opening and avoid leaks etc.
So what are you getting from a container? Structure. You are getting a structure and you are getting a potentially interesting house. You are re-using items that may otherwise go to landfills. You can stack them! You can arrange them, etc. They are inspiring to the designer mind. You will not get and average house for sure and that may be enough of a reason to take that route...but it is not easy or cheap really in the end. It would probably be more cost effective in a CT climate to simply build a stud wall box from scratch.
Actually- below is a picture of a house clad in steel (rusted - or 'corten' steel). It is not built out of shipping containers. (house by Simon Ungers and Tom Knislow)
Next - on to insulation and wall options I promise!
Elizabeth
Posted at 07:25 AM in Tech Talk - House Parts | Permalink | Comments (1)
Not all Green houses are created equal. Some are 'greener' than others. We like refer to this as 'shades of green'. Of our 4 new houses I would rank them like this:
Rowayton and California: Super- dark Green! Definitely LEED certifiable Gold or Platinum. (Rowayton is the only house actually getting certified and we are hovering on the Gold /Platinum line) Both are extremely energy efficient, use low carbon footprint materials and construction and make good use of alternatives in the form of Geothermal (ground source heat pump), Photo-voltaics (electrical solar panels) and Solar Thermal Panels (hot water solar panels)
Westport: Very Green. This house would probably get LEED Silver at least. Very energy efficient, mostly green materials and products, and use of geothermal.
Greenwich: Light Green. This is a solid energy efficient house- much better than your standard house construction - but not extreme in its green measures.
(btw: LEED is a rating system that registers how 'green' a building is. You can go to this website to learn more:USGBC website
So what is the difference. Well, as Mies van der Rohe said 'God is in the details'. Its all about individual components, very specific construction details and methods and degrees of performance in products such as insulation and windows. Today we will look at windows:
Below is a photo of the windows at the Greenwich house. They are quality Marvin windows. Nice.
You can see from their sticker (below) that they get a U-factor of .32, a Solar Heat Gain Coefficient of .26 and Visible Transmission of .45. The U-factor is like the R value of insulation. It tells us how energy efficient the window is. Solar Heat Gain Coefficient tells us how much of the sun's rays are getting though (You want the sun to get in if you are in a heating season and your house is designed for passive solar heat gain..you don't want the sun to get in because it fades the upholstery.) The Visibility refers to just that -how 'see through' the window is.
Films that are applied to make the window more efficient will lead to less visibility and less solar heat gain. So sometimes if we have designed a house to work in a passive solar way -yet still want it to be very energy efficient- we have to play a trade off game. Like maybe we decide to make the south facing windows less energy efficient than all the others so that we can get that winter sun in to heat up the house.
Here is a picture of the Westport house's windows:
They look very similar and are in fact made by the same parent company - Marvin Windows. These windows are - however- Marvin Integrity Windows. They get a U Factor of .29 or .30 depending on which window, a SHGC of .26 and VT of .46.
With U-factors, the smaller the number the better (the more efficient the windows). With this U Factor they are eligible to get the $1500 federal tax credit for energy efficient windows...but just barely.The u-factor needs to be .30 or less to apply. Next year I think they are lowering it to .28...I need to verify that. These windows meet Energy Star requirements (another sort of rating system.)
These windows are better performers than the 'normal' Marvins on the Old Greenwich house. Both are double paned, Low-E glass and filled with Argon gas. The Integrities are primarily fiberglass frames with wood veneer on the inside where as the normal Marvins are primarily wood frames with aluminum cladding on the outside. Fiberglass is more efficient than wood, wood is more efficient than metal.The difference in U factors comes from other tings too- like what the spacer bar between the glass is made of and how the windows are assembled.
The Integrities are less costly than the normal (O.G.)Marvins. So why not buy them? Well many people don't like fiberglass windows (Integrities or anyone's) when they get up close and personal(too thin or flimsier than the normal Marvins.) But honestly I think they have come a long way! I think they look pretty darn good up close and personal these days.
(And just as a note- my Minnesota architect friends think that the Integrities don't even cut it as energy efficient windows. They usually spec triple pane fiberglass windows with no muntins (you know those window grilles that everyone likes so much). Those windows achieve U factors of .20 or .22 or sometimes even as low as .15 or .16!! Pretty amazing. But in our neck of the woods we have a more mild climate and it is not really worth the cost to get windows that are THAT efficient. (Although if you really want to live 'off the grid' you should go for it.) People usually are concerned about the R.O.I. (return on investment) and don't see the value.
BUT speaking of triple pane windows- lets look at the Rowayton house:
These windows are triple pane Eagle windows with a wood frame and aluminum clad exterior. They get a U factor of .27. The best of our group. They achieve this due to the 2 air spaces between the 3 panes as well as having the low-E 4 glass. You can read about it here at Eagle Windows. These windows cost more than the Integrities but less than the normal Marvins and they give the benefits of having a nice wood window with high efficiency.
The performance of the window in the envelope also depends a lot on how they are installed and how those gaps around the windows are sealed. We'll get into that more later...
Ok- tomorrow lets talk insulation!
Posted at 02:33 PM in Tech Talk - House Parts | Permalink | Comments (0)
Technorati Tags: Eagle Windows, energy efficient tax credits, geothermal, green building, Insulation, Integrity windows, LEED, Low E4, Marvin, shades of green, U factor
Today we had the guys from C-Solar out to the Rowayton,CT house to map out the PV and Solar Thermal systems. The roof faces due solar south- perfect orientation - (because we planned it that way!)and we have 2 different roof slopes. The main roof will be optimal for winter sun PV and year round solar thermal. The big shed dormer provides and excellent angle for the summer sun. We can easily fit a 10kW PV system alone, OR 7.5kW PV system with 3 or 4 solar thermal panels for hot water. The guys are going to crunch the numbers (show us the rebates and tax incentive numbers and energy use estimates) and then the client will decide which way to go.
70 degrees and sunny! Happy spring.
Elizabeth
Posted at 02:15 PM in LEED Home in Rowayton, CT | Permalink | Comments (0)
Technorati Tags: CT, energy efficient, geothermal, green house, LED lights, off the grid, solar, Super insulated, sustainable home
Posted at 01:43 PM in Thoughts, Musings and Rants | Permalink | Comments (0)
Posted at 01:05 PM in Thoughts, Musings and Rants | Permalink | Comments (1)
We encourage the use of ceiling fans! Especially in energy efficient houses because they make such an impact.
A tighter, more well insulated house already requires less heating and cooling -as you know -and it shortens the heating season and shortens the cooling season. (The amount of time you have the heat turned on during the year, and the amount of time you have the AC turned on during the year)
Fans make the cooling season even shorter. Instead of using air conditioning - say 30 -60 days during the summer -you may use AC only 5-10 days during the summer.
Our houses are designed for cross ventilation and fans. Cross ventilation alone is good, but if you add fans it makes it much more useful/ efficient- especially at night.
How about with a geothermal system?
"We have a geothermal system. Does this still apply? The cooling comes so efficiently from that system."
Well, it costs electric to run the cooling for the geothermal (pump and fans). I guess its the difference between the electric for geothermal and fans...which is more? I just asked my contractor bud and he said fans would be cheaper than running the geothermal for sure.
Posted at 12:55 PM in Tech Talk - House Parts | Permalink | Comments (0)
Posted at 01:32 PM in 1. Trillium New Houses | Permalink | Comments (0)
Posted at 01:23 PM in 1. Trillium New Houses | Permalink | Comments (0)
Posted at 12:42 PM in 1. Trillium New Houses | Permalink | Comments (0)
Posted at 12:41 PM in 1. Trillium New Houses | Permalink | Comments (0)
This house in Rowayton, CT is approximately 4,000 sf including the basement, 1st and 2nd floors. It is being built on the site of a previously existing 2,200 sf home. The original intention of the owner was to keep as much of the existing structure as possible. In this case, however, the ceilings of the existing home were all 7’-0” tall and the structural members of the home could not economically support any additions. (Large quantities of steel would have had to be added. This was a disappointing revelation for both the home owner and the architect shared the goal of creating a very green, LEED certified home and keeping the existing home from entering the landfill is a big first step in sustainable construction.
Once it was decided to tear the existing house down and start fresh, we were given a bit of a blank slate as far as design went. We had a few parameters to work with:
1. The footprint would be limited by zoning code to approximately 1400 sf.
2. The house would be turned to face due solar south for a roof PV installation.
3. The driveway could not be moved.
4. The major living spaces in the house should face the view (a small pond and stream in the back yard.)
5. The first floor would be open living space, the second floor would hold 3-4 bedroom for the family of 4 and the walk-out basement would house playroom, guestroom, mudroom and garage.
6. The clients were invested in the idea of having a great house for entertaining.
7. The clients were very invested in the idea of having an extremely energy efficient and healthy house that they would have LEED certified and would do so for the purpose of promoting environmentally friendly building.
With these parameters in mind we came up with these floor plans.
The house is highly suitable to the family and every space is utilized. There are no useless living rooms and dining rooms that are only used 2 times a year. The spaces are flexible enough to work for the family during day to day life and for friends and parties when needed. For example, the dining room is designed to be intimate in its located space but able to expand out into the foyer when a long table is desired. The bedrooms were designed as more intimate spaces for sleeping only with large closets storage, sitting rooms and bathrooms for other uses that often creep into bedroom living.
Posted at 01:09 PM in LEED Home in Rowayton, CT | Permalink | Comments (0)
Posted at 01:08 PM in LEED Home in Rowayton, CT | Permalink | Comments (0)
Posted at 12:03 PM in LEED Home in Rowayton, CT | Permalink | Comments (0)
Technorati Tags: architecture, energy efficient building, Green home, house, LEED, LEED certified
Day one on the Blog. We are a full service Architecture firm located in Fairfield County CT. We specialize in fine green homes. We have been designing with the tenets of sustainability for over a dozen years and know well the nuances and technologies that go into creating a truly livable, beautiful and affordable energy efficient home. Welcome to our blog!
Posted at 01:53 PM | Permalink | Comments (0)